October 6, 2006

"She had previously run for 12 hours non-stop but was unused to running on roads."

Said Dominque Lakra, the coach of the 10-year-old Anastasia Barla, who ran 72 kilometers (45 miles) before stopping out of exhaustion. But the 5-minute break she'd taken after 58 kilometers had invalidated her attempt to beat Budhia Singh, the 4-year-old boy who ran 65 kilometers without a break. "The girl is comfortable on soil, which is soft," the not-so-soft-hearted coach explained. Anastasia is going to give it another try when the weather cools off, in India, where there is a truly crazy craze for long-distance running by children.

8 comments:

I'm Full of Soup said...

Just think-if she tried that in America, they would lock up the coach for child abuse.

Ann Althouse said...

AJ: Rightly so, and that's why we don't see that level of abuse here. Children aren't supposed to run more than 15 miles a week. And the dangers include renal failure.

Ann Althouse said...

Dave: From the linked article: "Marathon experts maintain that children under 10 should not run more than 15 miles a week. The minimum age for competing in international marathons — a distance of 26.2 miles (42km) — is 18."

Sanjay said...

I can't believe those numbers would be so freakishly amazing if you put pedometers on the average toddler. It's just a lack of data.

Ann Althouse said...

Sanjay: Interesting point, but keep in mind that a toddler is running around doing exactly what motivates him in the present. What's especially disturbing about these child runners is that they're maintaining a fixation on a distant goal, for reasons that an adult has put into their heads. Even if it we're physical abuse, it would be psychological abuse.

tcd: I doubt if Guinness accepts record-setting by children.

tiggeril said...

And if you watch Indian TV you'll see that the famewhore bug isn't a Western one. Lots of singing/talent competitions for the kids.

Sanjay said...

Professor Althouse, I think you have a solid point with the physical abuse -- but not the psychological (at least for the four year old -- the ten year old, not so sure). My three-year-old will run like hell for quite literally hours on end because, I suppose ultimately,of some goofy idea I have put in her head ("pretend to be a flying pteranodon" or the like). I cnan't believe that four-year-old's concept of what was going on much matches ours, nor that he wasn't, in his own way, digging it.

knox said...

the 4-year-old boy who ran 65 kilometers without a break

Just imagine Mark Foley's behind you... you can do anything!