August 25, 2005

"He doesn't have a sexist bone in his body."

Said Linda Chavez about Supreme Court nominee John Roberts. She's one of the "Women for Roberts," who are trying to prevent what they call "feminists on the left" from dominating what gets said about Roberts and women.

Groups opposing Roberts have made way too much out of his opposition to the "comparable worth" theory, and it's important to counter that. At the same time, the question isn't whether Roberts is "sexist," but how he will resolve various legal issues once he's on the Supreme Court. Interpreting constitutional rights narrowly and limiting the ability of women to seek judicial remedies are things that a judge without "a sexist bone in his body" could easily do. By the same token, I'll bet many of the votes cast in favor of women's rights on the Court over the years came from Justices who were big sexists.

2 comments:

XWL said...

What about Chavez's comment and the extent and vehemence with which she declared Judge Roberts' inability to be sexist inadvertently fitting in with the 'he's probably gay' whisper campaign.

After all, isn't it more or less expected that straight men have a sexist bone or two in their body from time to time?

(I certainly do)

ploopusgirl said...

Wow, something to be proud of, Leroy! :)) Way to promote that right-wing agenda!!